Vote For A Veteran

Leadership 2.png
work ethic.png
National Security.png

 

Mark Richardson 

United States Navy Veteran 

VS24 Squadron  

Carrier Airwing 8

USS Nimitz CVN68

Veteran Vote.png

Operation Eagle Claw

Presidential Unit Citation

Battle "E" Battle "E"

Naval Expeditionary Medal

Shellback

At its core, this campaign is about you, so don’t hesitate to get in touch with us via Facebook or Twitter, Email, Text, Phone and let me know what you’re concerned about these days. Thanks so much, and I look forward to seeing you on the campaign trail.

Privacy Policy * Terms Of Use * Help * Contact Us * Home Page

Text OH3 to 22999 to receive mobile alerts!**Message and data rates may apply. Text "STOP" to opt-out.T&C/Privacy Policy: sms-terms.com/OH3

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

190 South High Street #470

Columbus, Ohio 43125

614-565-1722

Paid For By Mark Richardson Committee to Elect

This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. ©2019 RichardsonForCongress.com Mark Richardson Committee To Elect. All rights reserved

 

Before the U.S can ever develop a HealthCare Plan we need to reduce the skyrocketing prices of HealthCare. The U.S. can slash health-care costs 75% with a 2 prong approach & without ‘Medicare for All

The U.S. has the highest prices for health care by far, and it’s crushing consumers. Prices are up for treatments, doctor visits and prescription drugs, while usage has remained flat or going down in many instances. The problem is driven by a complete lack of transparency, particularly on the price side. As the Democratic presidential candidates argue about “Medicare for All” versus a “public option,” two simple policy changes could slash U.S. health-care costs by 75% while increasing access and improving the quality of care.

These policies have been proven to work by ingenious companies like Whole Foods and innovative governments like the state of Indiana and Singapore. If they were rolled out nationally, the United States would save $2.4 trillion per year across individuals, businesses, and the government.

 

A PRICE TAG  is a necessary prerequisite for competition and efficiency. Under our current system, it’s nearly impossible for people with health insurance to find out in advance what anything covered by their insurance will end up costing. Patients have no way to comparison shop for procedures covered by insurance, and providers are under little pressure to lower costs.By contrast, there is intense competition among the providers of medical services like LASIK eye surgery that aren’t covered by health insurance. For those procedures, providers must compete for market share and profits by figuring out ways to improve efficiency and lower prices.

THE FIRST POLICY IS TRANSPARENCY

They must also advertise to get customers in the door, and must ensure high quality to generate customer loyalty and benefit from word of mouth. That’s why the price of LASIK eye surgery, as just one example, has fallen so dramatically even as quality has soared. Adjusted for inflation, LASIK cost nearly $4,000 per eye when it made its debut in the 1990s. These days, the average price is around $2,000 per eye and you can get it done for as little as $1,000 on sale.

By contrast, ask yourself what a appendectomy or colonoscopy will cost you. There’s no way to tell. Price tags also insure that everybody pays the same amount. We currently have a health-care system in which providers charge patients wildly different prices depending on their insurance. A RIP OFF, that injustice will end if we insist on legally mandated price tags and require that every patient be charged the same price. An example of the complex codes and names for health care services and goods.  A plain box of tissues becomes a "mucous recovery system" in health care speak. That mucous recovery system ends up costing the patient $128.00,  'cough support device' is a Teddy bear for kids to calm them down, and they charged $87 for that, or $23 charge for a Q-tip. 

Why is it okay that a federal law that requires a good faith estimate when you get a mortgage but it's okay for our health care system to keep you in the dark on pricing a medical procedure.   The majority of the population in the United States can relate to having undisclosed and excessive medical fees for procedures performed or know someone who has.  We are proposing changes to the medical fields to regulate and stabilize current practices and billing procedures to be equal and disclosed to patients in every State of the United States.  We also are advocating for scheduled procedures a hospital or any medical facility to require a “MEDICAL GOOD FAITH ESTIMATE” with anticipated charges and any expenses for future treatments. As a side benefit, all of that bickering and chicanery goes away and we will also see massively lower administrative costs. They are currently extremely high because once a doctor submits a bill to an insurance company, the insurance company works hard to deny or discount the claim. Thus begins a hideously costly and drawn-out negotiation that eventually yields the dollar amount that the doctor will get reimbursed. As does the need for gargantuan bureaucracies to process claims.

The second policy—deductible security—pairs an insurance policy that has an annual deductible with a health savings account (HSA) that the policy’s sponsor funds each year with an amount equal to the annual deductible.

The policy’s sponsor can be either a private employer like Whole Foods (now part of Amazon. AMZN, -2.79% ), which has been doing this since 2002, or a government entity like the state of Indiana, which has been offering deductible security to its employees since 2007.

While Indiana offers its workers a variety of health-care plans, the vast majority opt for the deductible security plan, under which the state covers the premium and then gifts $2,850 into each employee’s HSA every year.

Since that amount is equal to the annual deductible, participants have money to pay for out-of-pocket expenses. But the annual gifts do more than ensure that participants are financially secure; they give people skin in the game. Participants spend prudently because they know that any unspent HSA balances are theirs to keep. The result? Massively lower health-care spending without any decrement to health outcomes.

We know this because Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels ordered a study that tracked health-care spending and outcomes for state employees during the 2007-to-2009 period when deductible security was first offered. Employees choosing this plan were, for example, 67% less likely to go to high-cost emergency rooms (rather than low-cost urgent care centers.) They also spent $18 less per prescription because they were vastly more likely to opt for generic equivalents rather than brand-name medicines.

Those behavioral changes resulted in 35% lower health-care spending than when the same employees were enrolled in traditional health insurance. Even better, the study found that employees enrolled in the deductible security plan were going in for mammograms, annual check ups, and other forms or preventive medicine at the same rate as when they were enrolled in traditional insurance. Thus, these cost savings are real and not due to people delaying necessary care in order to hoard their HSA balances.

By contrast, the single-payer “Medicare for All” proposal that is being pushed by Bernie Sanders and Kamala Harris would create a health-care system in which consumers never have skin in the game and in which prices are hidden for every procedure.

That lack of skin in the game will generate an expenditure explosion. We know this because when Oregon randomized 10,000 previously uninsured people into single-payer health insurance starting in 2008, the recipients’ annual health-care spending jumped 36% without any statistically significant improvements in health outcomes.

Look at Singapore

By contrast, if we were to require price tags in addition to deductible security, the combined savings would amount to about 75% of what we are paying now for health care.

We know this to be true because while price tags and deductible security were invented in the United States, only one country has had the good sense to roll them out nationwide. By doing so, Singapore is able to deliver universal coverage and the best health outcomes in the world while spending 77% less per capita than the United States and about 60% less per capita than the United Kingdom, Canada, Japan, and other advanced industrial economies.

Providers post prices in Singapore, and people have plenty of money in their HSA balances to cover out-of-pocket expenses. As in the United States, regulators set coverage standards for private insurance companies, which then accept premiums and pay for costs in excess of the annual deductible. The government also directly pays for health care for the indigent.

The result is a system in which government spending constitutes about half of all health-care spending, as is the case in the United States. But because prices are so much lower, the Singapore government spends only about 2.4% of GDP on health care. By contrast, government health-care spending in the United States runs at 8% of GDP.

With Singapore’s citizenry empowered by deductible security and price tags, competition has worked its magic, forcing providers to constantly figure out ways to lower costs and improve quality. The result is not only 77% less spending than the United States but also, as Bloomberg Businessweek reports, one of the healthiest populations in the world.